Does a merchant of record mean I owe no tax at all?

No. It means the merchant of record handles consumption taxes — sales tax and VAT — on those sales. You still owe income tax on your own profit, and still have your own entity's filing obligations.

Do I lose the customer relationship?

Partly. The merchant of record is the seller on the customer's statement and in the transaction record, and you typically get less checkout control and less direct payment data. For some businesses that is a real cost.

Yes, though subscription businesses need to plan migration carefully because card credentials generally do not transfer between providers. Starting on a merchant of record and moving to your own processor at scale is a common path.

Getting paid: payment processing for a US company

Guide · 2 min read

Merchant of record vs your own Stripe

A merchant of record costs more per transaction and removes an entire compliance problem. Whether that is worth it depends almost entirely on who your customers are.

The short answer

A merchant of record legally sells your product to the customer and assumes responsibility for collecting and remitting sales tax and VAT worldwide. It costs a higher percentage than a raw payment processor, and is generally worth it for software sold to consumers across many countries.

A merchant of record is legally the seller. The customer buys from them; they pay you. The consequence that matters is tax: they, not you, are responsible for collecting and remitting consumption taxes wherever your customers live.

Use your own processor when	Use a merchant of record when
You sell mainly B2B, mainly domestically	You sell to consumers in many countries
Margins are thin and every point matters	Global VAT compliance would otherwise fall on you
You need full control of checkout and data	You would rather not register for VAT anywhere
You have accounting support in place	You are a solo founder with no tax support

The cost comparison people get wrong

Comparing a merchant of record's percentage against a raw processor's percentage is not the real comparison. The real comparison includes what VAT registration, filing and remittance across multiple jurisdictions would cost you in fees and time — and the risk of getting it wrong.

For a solo founder selling a $20/month product to consumers in thirty countries, that calculation usually favours the merchant of record decisively. For a $50,000 B2B contract with a US client, it does not.

See getting paid for how this fits the rest of the stack.

Frequently asked questions

Does a merchant of record mean I owe no tax at all?: No. It means the merchant of record handles consumption taxes — sales tax and VAT — on those sales. You still owe income tax on your own profit, and still have your own entity's filing obligations.
Do I lose the customer relationship?: Partly. The merchant of record is the seller on the customer's statement and in the transaction record, and you typically get less checkout control and less direct payment data. For some businesses that is a real cost.
Can I switch later?: Yes, though subscription businesses need to plan migration carefully because card credentials generally do not transfer between providers. Starting on a merchant of record and moving to your own processor at scale is a common path.

Sources

Streamlined Sales Tax Governing Board

Last reviewed August 23, 2026. Verify against the primary source before acting.

Founders 8 does not provide tax advice. Tax residency depends on facts and rules specific to each jurisdiction — review your position with a qualified adviser.

More in Getting paid: payment processing for a US company

All of Getting paid: payment processing for a US company